Cannabinoids offer new directions for prostate cancer treatment. Cannabis and Prostate Cancer - Medical Marijuana - Sperling Prostate. Final Thoughts on CBD & Prostate Cancer. Research on marijuana, CBD and prostate cancer faces the same problem as all weed-related. Prostate cancer cells possess increased expression of both cannabinoid 1 and 2 Cannabis and cannabinoids have often been an issue of much polemics in but since the discovery of cannabinoid receptors in rat brain in the late s, .
CBD Final Prostate on Thoughts Cancer &
I have great respect for you wonderfull nurses.. I thank you for the detailed reply and i agree in part. Also we have placed trust time and again with nhs staff only to be mistreated, lied to and let down. How for example is shouting at a vulnerable family in crisis going to help anyone? Thank you for the offer of help though. Hi Chrissie I appreciate your reply to my post. I am grateful for all views in fact.
I did print out the first few pages from the health rack website showing it is legal as a health food supplement but she was adamant it was illegal and started her shouting rant. I should have manned up last time.
This week hopefully will be different. I will have a look in the CR research engine but I have done a lot of poking around the internet or I would not have started his nibs on CBD in the first place. Been on it about 2 weeks now.
Pain not significantly better but hey its not worse as it was threatening to be. Also massive mood improvement. As its not regulated and unclear what the right doses are, I did start at the bottom end, so may be the strength or amount I am giving isn't enough.
I still don't regret it though. Its had a positive effect, no bad side effects and Ive felt like I have done somthing. Just like to mention I am a Social Scientist by trade so I seek scientific research. Nothing less will do. I will have a look at the links you have kindly provided. I would never risk giving the most precious thing in my life anything I thought would hasten him away from me.
Indeed even when I made the choice of product, I discussed it with him in detail and first tried it on myself. I am really grateful for all viewpoints and assistance. I read on here someone refused chemo in favour of canabis oil. That is a brave step. I personally would not turn my back on conventional treatments completely, but equally don't condemn that.
Cancer is rife in hubbys family; one sister chose a very different path to us. After diagnosis, she chose to give up. No food, no meds, and less than a month later we went to the funeral. I saw benefits as well as downers to her decision; yes she missed months if not a year or so with the family, very sad, but also saved herself and them a lot of suffering,worry and fear.
The British Medical journal has some interesting articles meriting further attention. Some sillier than others, but a bit more palatable. The main thing is making the effort to look. No one should be dismissed because whatever they read wasn't science based enough. It is important to listen to others' experiences. That includes listening to people on here. If someone's dad had a cancer that went away after treatemnt only with custard.
My attitude isn't " not scientific, go away", it's "Really, then lets look at this right away! This forum reaffirmed my own experience about how disconnected many carers are from the world out there.
What a wealth of people there are who desperately want to 'offer support' maybe especially 'professionals', but when the chips are down, it is a very lonely path, not for everyone, but those who can't fit the 9 to 5, those living remotely, those who can't drive nor live on the hospice doorstep When I realised this for the first time despite an honours degree in the science of society, my eyes were like dinner plates!
Academia was once a drug to me but without commonsense and worldly experience Real experiences people on here share are what have upped my game so far. Here here well said So thank you for starting this thread In experiments with mice, animals given very high doses of purified THC seemed to have a lower risk of developing cancer, and there has been some research suggesting that endocannabinoids cannabinoids produced by the body can suppress tumour growth.
This is mainly because most people who use cannabis smoke it mixed with tobacco, a substance that definitely does cause cancer. In some parts of the world — including the Netherlands — medical use of marijuana has been legalised for palliative use relieving pain and symptoms , including cancer pain.
But one of the problems of using herbal cannabis is about dosage — smoking it or taking it in the form of tea often provides a variable dose, which may make it difficult for patients to monitor their intake.
So researchers are turning to alternative dosing methods, such as mouth sprays, which deliver a reliable and regulated dose. We want to see safe, reliable and effective treatments become available for patients as quickly as possible. We receive no government funding for our research, and it is all paid for by the generosity of the public. This is obviously not a bottomless purse, and we do not have financial reserves to draw on.
Because of this limitation, we can only fund the very best research proposals that come to us that will bring benefits to people with cancer. Our funding committees have previously received other applications from researchers who want to investigate cannabinoids that have failed to reach our high standards for funding. If we receive future proposals that do meet these stringent requirements, then there is no reason why they would not be funded — assuming we have the money available to do so.
But whole plants or other organisms are a complex mix of hundreds of chemicals not all of which may be beneficial and contains low or variable levels of active ingredients.
This makes it difficult to give accurate doses and runs the risk of toxic side effects. Foxgloves — a source of medically useful chemicals.
These drugs are now used to treat many thousands of people around the world with heart failure and other cardiac problems. But the entire plant itself is highly toxic, and eating just a small amount can kill. But this naturally-occurring chemical causes severe stomach irritation, which led to the German company Bayer developing an alternative version — acetylsalicylic acid — which was kinder to the tummy. Aspirin is now arguably one of the most successful drugs of all time, and is still being investigated for its potential in preventing or even treating cancer.
As we said above, there is no good evidence that natural cannabinoids, at the doses present in simple cannabis preparations, can treat cancer in patients. There is a strong and persistent presence on the internet arguing that cannabis can cure cancer. Despite what the supporters of these sources may claim, videos and stories are not scientific evidence for the effectiveness of any cancer treatment.
We know nothing about their medical diagnosis, stage of disease or outlook. People who make these bold claims for cannabis only pick their best cases, without presenting the full picture. This highlights the importance of publishing data from scientifically rigorous lab research and clinical trials. Firstly because conducting proper clinical studies enables researchers to prove that a prospective cancer treatment is safe and effective.
And secondly because publishing this data allows doctors around the world to judge for themselves and use it for the benefit of their patients.
Internet anecdotes and videos prove nothing and benefit no-one — we need reliable, scientific research, which as discussed above is exactly what is going on. Not only to the thousands of our scientists, doctors and nurses who are working as hard as they can to find more effective treatments for the complex set of challenging diseases we call cancer, but also the hundreds of thousands of people in the UK and beyond who support this life-saving work through generous donations of money, energy and time.
Our aim is to beat cancer, and we believe that the best way to do this through rigorous scientific research aimed at understanding cancer on a biological level and working out how to prevent, detect and treat it more effectively. As a research-based organisation, we want to see reliable scientific evidence to support claims made about any cancer treatment, be it conventional or alternative. This is vital because lives are at stake. If someone chooses to reject conventional cancer treatment in favour of unproven alternatives, including cannabis, they may miss out on treatment that could save or significantly lengthen their life.
They may also miss out on effective symptom relief to control their pain and suffering, or the chance to spend precious time with their loved ones. Furthermore, many of these unproven therapies come at a high price, and are not covered by the NHS or medical insurance.
And, in the worst cases, an alternative therapy may even hasten death. They can increase the heart rate, which may cause problems for patients with pre-existing or undiagnosed heart conditions.
They can also interact with other drugs in the body, including antidepressants and antihistamines. And they may also affect how the body processes certain chemotherapy drugs, which could cause serious side effects. Within a matter of hours she was in hospital in a coma. When conventional treatment fails, there is little chance that turning to an unproven alternative touted on the internet will provide a cure.
CBD oil - dilemma
in prostate cancer using both in vitro and in vivo models. the main psychoactive constituents, THC and CBD. THC acts as a . commentaries, and expert opinions . eligibility, 21 studies were included for final analysis. Cannabis oil has been on the minds of men with prostate cancer. It seems that The most powerful cannabinoid is thought to be the chemical. In our hospital's daily practice we notice the popular use of cannabis oil in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. As a nursing specialist for urology, I have even met.