28th January To the Director General and Executive Board of the World Health Organization,. We write to you, as members of the global. Thirteenth General Programme of Work, – WHO Impact Human resources update, including on the global internship programme. EB/ 21 January | The UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/UNICEF/World Bank Special Programme WHO updates guidance to help healthcare workers prevent postpartum.
2019 Health World Organization UPDATE: Letter January
Learn how certain foods and nutrients affect cognition, and get the facts about brain-boosting foods such as green tea and dark chocolate so you can live the most mentally healthy lifestyle possible for years to come.
Feeling fit and well will help you get the most out of your everyday life as you age. Tufts experts will give you the knowledge to manage your health and offer tips on to increase your energy and maintain your independence. Stay on top of the latest health research to get the most out of life. According to the World Health Organization WHO , about 34, cancer deaths per year worldwide are attributable to diets high in processed meats.
While that number pales in comparison to the one million or so global cancer deaths related to smoking, it is significant enough to warrant a hard look at processed meats in our diets, especially because they are also associated with cardiovascular disease and other health conditions. If the results of a new Swedish study are borne out, blood thinners may be added to the arsenal of heart attack prevention measures.
The study, published recently in the Annals of Internal Medicine, tested the blood of individuals under age 75 years admitted to Swedish hospitals for a first heart attack and an equal number of healthy controls looking for antibodies related to blood clotting.
For an easy way to follow all of this sound dietary advice at the same time, simply up your intake of foods from the legume family. Legumes, which include beans, lentils, split peas, green peas, and peanuts, are thought to be one of the first cultivated crops and have been consumed by people around the world for over 10, years. Unfortunately, legumes are no longer a staple food in most American diets. The Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommend adults consume one to three cups of legumes per week depending on calorie requirements , but average intake is less than one cup weekly.
According to the World Health Organization WHO , depression is the leading cause of disability worldwide, affecting more than million adults and children.
While to date there is no specific diet proven to prevent or cure this condition, research indicates that decreasing depression risk may be yet another reason to aim for a healthy dietary pattern. Should we be concerned about potentially unsafe amounts of the herbicide glyphosate in oat products? A study led by a Tufts researcher has found an association between levels of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in the blood over time and healthy aging. A recent study published in the Journal of Nutrition found that consuming protein supplements did not help active older men build more muscle or gain more strength than resistance exercise training alone.
Forty-one men with an average age of 70 completed whole-body resistance training three times a week for 12 weeks. Half the group drank a supplement containing 21 grams of protein after exercise and every night before bed.
The other half drank a beverage with the same number of calories but no protein. At the end of the study period, while both groups were able to lift more weight and tests showed increased muscle mass, the protein group did not improve any more than the placebo group.
According to the most recent national survey data, nearly 40 percent of American adults and It is recommended that adults consume between 25 and 30 grams of dietary fiber a day. The average American currently gets about half that amount.
But is that fiber as good for our health as fiber found naturally in fruits, vegetables, nuts, legumes, and whole grains? Following a vegan diet may promote weight loss and reduce insulin resistance in overweight individuals. If that is the case, the corollary is that you would rather tobacco companies only made cigarettes, and more people died as a result, as long as the companies made less money. The main argument of the activist letter is that the Foundation has an association with a tobacco company, so it must, a priori , be a bad thing.
The letter reaches for the comforting certainties of Article 5. However, there is something important happening in the nicotine market: The harm reduction approach is synergistic, not antagonistic, to conventional tobacco control MPOWER measures because it creates new options to respond to the incentives and pressures of tobacco control policies.
Public health is a tough discipline, with the lives of thousands, maybe millions, of other people on the line. So there should be a strong duty of curiosity: This was never right, by the way. Even in or it was already apparent that a tobacco product, snus, made by a tobacco company, Swedish Match, was having a dramatic beneficial effect on smoking in Nordic and Scandinavian countries. Would you be the enemy of that sort of innovation? Does this letter really make an argument or consider the issues carefully?
Or would you just be buying into a flash mob designed to intimidate researchers, delegitimise its staff and marginalise its work — not based on the quality or value of what it does, but on its origins?
I have written about my concerns about tobacco control mob behaviour previously:. My impression is that international tobacco control is becoming less about health and more about the tobacco industry. I have done my fair share of that, but this is happening at exactly the moment where the entire industry is facing disruption and major changes are possible by looking at the situation more imaginatively and with an open mind.
WHF and Partners say no to tobacco industry policy interference. This is the same sort of stuff, but I will confine myself to providing unwelcome advice to those considering signing the one above. I have no conflict of interest with respect to the Foundation, though I wish it well and hope it succeeds, I have no plans to apply to be on its staff or board or to apply for grant funding. I have no conflict of interest with respect to PMI. Simply opposing anything done by, or in some way associated with, a declared enemy is a seldom a good strategy.
I think a better one is to agree on a goal maximum practical reduction in tobacco-caused disease and death, for instance and strategically pursue it. Thus, the actions of other players can be evaluated in relation to that goal. Disruptive innovation on nicotine and the disarray it is causing in the cigarette industry creates huge opportunities to creatively exploit. A simple logic model says the FSFW can be either genuine or a sham, and we can either support or oppose.
If we act like we support it, there is a big win by either facilitating our health goals or revealing a sham. If it is simply opposed, we only have downsides — health loses if it was genuine, but also loses if it was a public relations ploy that never gets shown to be one.
To what degree the abstinence only activists attacking the FSFW are involved with the pharmaceutical industry? Millions of dollars are involved — and not much accountability with it. A private sector, product-based, consumer-driven response is countercultural and threatening. Vaping etc is disruptive to the tobacco industry, but it is also disruptive to tobacco control. While not the totemic cause, the pharmaceutic industry is well positioned in the global anti-THR effort.
However, while the pharmaceutics are partners with the Tobacco Control bureaucracy in fighting THR, the odds are not the same for each one. For the pharmaceutics it is a battle to protect their products against competition by e-cigs and other nicotine delivery consumer products, they can easily recover loses if their products are phased out. For the Tobacco Control apparatus it is a war for survival as a powerful actor: You can use these HTML tags.
Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Notify me of new posts by email. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. The great American youth vaping epidemic. Think before you sign: WHO Executive Board — will it see beyond the pestering of abstinence-only activists?
I recommend asking seven questions before signing: Does the letter truthfully reflect the approach of the Foundation? Does the letter truthfully reflect the approach of PMI? Would you be criticising what are, in fact, positive developments?
Are you opposed to public health benefits if tobacco companies make money as a result? Are you joining the enemies of innovation? Are you joining a mob? Here is the draft activist letter that I received: The draft activist letter asserts that the Foundation is trying to: Activist letter But the Foundation is not trying to do that — at least as far as its open letter is concerned.
It is important to be precise here: FSFW open letter Or take this statement from the activist letter: I asked the company about this recently. This was its response: PMI spokesperson As far as I am aware, it has also withdrawn from involvement in WTO challenges to plain packaging for combustibles, except in one legacy case where it cannot withdraw for contractual reasons.
Diplomatic Courier, 16 January FSFW has an overarching objective that is similar: FSFW web site — emphasis in the original. Activist letter Yet it is included in the definition of tobacco control in the FCTC Article 1 d and commands considerable support among experts with no competing interests.
January 27th, Category:
Consultancy Tender Job at World Health Organization - in Uganda
Home · Updates · Countries · Disasters · Topics · Organizations · Jobs · Training. 22 Jan The World Health Organization Iraq delivers four trucks loaded with kits and medical supplies to Baghdad 22 January – Responding to the need of the His Excellency the Governor of Diyala instructed to send a letter of . Really?» January 27th, pave the road for partnership with the World Health Organization (WHO). Activist letter. But the Foundation is not trying to do that. 24 January cannabis-related substances and whether the World Health Organization (WHO) should a separate letter under the same date as this letter. looked forward to an updated report on cannabis by the Expert Committee.